Comments
(What worked well? What could work better next time?)
Action Items and Recommendations
Initial stage of the outbreak
Outbreak detection and surveillance systems (e.g., notification through NESP, PulseNet)
Verifying the diagnosis through laboratory analysis (serotyping, PFGE, WGS)
Case definitions (define and identify cases)
Notification of partners (P/Ts, CDC, use of Public Health Alerts, senior management, Duty Officers)
Outbreak Investigation Coordination Committee
Initial Assessment
Was the assessment call held in a timely manner? Were partners given enough notice?
Activation
Decision-making and building consensus around activation of OICC?
Were the roles and responsibilities of the FIORP Duty Officers understood?
OICC Calls
Comments on OICC calls (e.g., frequency, structure, attendees)
Describe and orient the data in person, place and time
Were the epi summaries clear, helpful, and distributed in a timely manner?
Was the line-list easy to understand?
Hypothesis generation/evaluation
Develop hypotheses (interviews, interaction with local/provincial partners)
Evaluate hypotheses (CDC collaboration, review of hypothesis generating interviews)
Refine hypotheses and carry out additional studies (analytic study methodology, preparation, questionnaire development, implementation and interviewing, analysis)